Prince Harry may gain an unexpected ally on security issues against the British government.
More than four years have passed since the royal family fought for the right to keep themselves and their families safe when visiting the UK, but in February 2020, after the royal family and Meghan Markle resigned from working royal duties, the court ruled against the royal family. However, Prince Harry is appealing the decision and may be using Taylor Swift’s name to overturn the case.
The new case is scheduled to be heard next spring, with sources familiar with the situation claiming that Prince Harry has “less protection in the UK than Taylor Swift”. After performing at Wembley Stadium in August following a terrorist plot, she was forced to cancel three shows in Austria.
“The government’s decision to provide an armed police escort during Taylor Swift’s performance at Wembley Stadium in August 2024 highlights significant inconsistencies in the way protection is determined by the UK authorities, and “It raises questions about transparency and consistency,” a source told People magazine. : “Obviously Prince Harry is treated very differently than everyone else.”
The official said the incident “demonstrates the need for a more systematic and transparent approach to protection decisions, ensuring both public safety and the fair application of security resources.” Explained.
Meanwhile, another source told the Telegraph: “The decision to give Taylor Swift a police escort exposes troubling inconsistencies in how protection decisions are reached.”
They continued: “Prince Harry has been denied protection despite consistent, long-term and well-documented threats against visiting performers, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art seeking advice from the Attorney General. We saw extraordinary measures being taken because the performer’s manager and parents threatened to remove her if she wasn’t given the protection she wanted.”
The Metropolitan Police Department previously released a statement regarding the situation. “The Metropolitan Museum of Art is operationally independent. “Our decisions are based on a thorough assessment of the threat, risk, harm, and circumstances of each incident,” and “the specifics of protective security arrangements.” It has been our long-standing position that we do not comment on specific details.”
Prince Harry revealed last year that he felt “forced” to leave the UK due to safety concerns and refused to “put his wife at risk”.
“It is with great sadness that my wife and I felt the need to step back from this role and move abroad in 2020,” he said in a statement, as reported by ITV. “Britain is my home. It is a center of tradition for my children and a place where I want them to feel as at home as they do now in the United States. That doesn’t happen without possibility.” Keep them safe when they are on the UK mainland. ”
His statement concluded: “I cannot put my wife at such risk, and given my life experiences, I am not comfortable putting myself at risk unnecessarily.”